This Tuskr vs Testmo comparison works through yearly totals by team size, plan caps versus unlimited volume, exploratory sessions, CI reporting and SSO gating so small to mid-sized teams can pick the right model. Tuskr sells named seats at $90 to $290 per user per year with a five-seat minimum; Testmo sells flat monthly bands for 5, 10, 15 or 25 users with unlimited projects and cases on every plan.
The usual mistake is to divide monthly Testmo by twelve and call it cheaper without counting band jumps or SSO tiers. Ten testers cost $900 a year on Tuskr Team against $1,188 on Testmo Team, but twelve testers jump to $2,988 on Testmo because the eleventh seat leaves the ten-user band, and mandatory SSO becomes $2,900 versus $7,188. The sections below match seat math to how your team runs tests, including charter-based work and run-volume caps.
Tuskr vs Testmo: Which Test Management Tool Should You Choose?
-
Per seat versus per band. Tuskr adds $90–$290 per user per year with a 5-seat minimum. Testmo charges flat monthly rates for bands of 5, 10, 15 or 25 users.
-
Caps versus unlimited volume. Tuskr limits projects, test cases and runs by plan. Testmo lists unlimited projects, cases, runs and automation results on every plan.
Tuskr vs Testmo Side-by-Side Comparison
| Tuskr | Testmo | |
|---|---|---|
| Best For | Teams of 5 to about 20 running scripted manual tests plus JUnit results, within published plan caps | Teams that run exploratory sessions, report heavy CI automation, or fill a user band |
| Pricing Model | Per named user, per year, 5-user minimum on paid plans | Flat monthly price per band of users |
| Starting Paid Price | Team: $90 per user per year, or $9 per user per month on monthly billing; 5-user minimum | Team: $59/month with 5 users included ($99/month for 10) |
| Free Plan / Trial | Free plan for up to 5 users; 15-day trial, no credit card | No free plan listed; 21-day free trial |
| SSO, 2FA, Audit Log | SSO on Enterprise only; audit trail and 2FA from Business | All three on Enterprise only ($599/month per 25 users) |
| Volume Limits | Capped per plan (Team: 50 projects, 50K test cases, 250 runs/project) | “Unlimited” projects, test cases, runs and automation results on every plan |
| Deployment | Cloud only, Google Cloud, United States | Cloud only, AWS US east; “We do not offer an on-premise server edition at this time” |
| Jira Integration | Creates Jira issues from failed tests and flags retest when the bug is fixed | Jira Cloud’s native New Issue dialog, plus a free Forge app showing linked results inside Jira |
| API | REST; 1,200 / 2,400 / 4,800 calls per hour by plan; not on Free | REST on every plan; throttling returns HTTP 429, no quota published |
| Automation Support | npm CLI, JUnit XML import with attachments | npm CLI, JUnit XML; sources, parallel threads, console capture; launching CI jobs on Enterprise |
| Exploratory Testing | Not mentioned on the features page or roadmap | Dedicated sessions with missions, notes, statuses and time tracking, on every plan |
| Vendor Certifications | States ISO 27001 certification and a SOC 2 audit | States “Testmo itself does not hold certifications as of now” |
| Key Differentiator | Seat-by-seat pricing from $90 a year, with requirements and issue tracking built in | One price per band with unlimited data, and a module for exploratory sessions |
| Main Limitation | Plan caps on projects, test cases, runs and requirements; SSO needs the $290 tier | SSO, 2FA and the audit log cost at least $7,188 a year regardless of headcount |
Quick verdict
If your volumes fit inside Tuskr’s Team or Business caps, Tuskr is the smaller bill at almost every headcount; otherwise Testmo’s unlimited runs and automation results are the safer buy. If exploratory sessions are part of your process, Testmo, because Tuskr documents no equivalent. If SSO is mandatory, Tuskr up to about 20 users and Testmo once a 25-user band is nearly full.
Key Differences Between Tuskr and Testmo
- Tuskr adds $90 to $290 a year per person; Testmo’s bill moves in steps. Tuskr’s cost is a straight line: each named user adds $90 (Team), $150 (Business) or $290 (Enterprise) a year, and a paid account never drops below five licences. Testmo’s cost is a staircase: Team covers up to 10 users, Business starts at 15 and then moves in blocks of 25, and Enterprise is sold in blocks of 25 only. The eleventh person moves a Testmo account from $99 to $249 a month, where the same hire adds $90 a year on Tuskr Team.
- Both keep SSO in the top tier, but only Tuskr prices that tier per seat. Tuskr’s pricing page marks Single Sign-On as Enterprise-only at $290 per user per year, with the audit trail and two-factor authentication starting at Business. Testmo places SAML SSO, two-factor enforcement and the user audit log together in Enterprise at $599 a month per 25 users. An eight-person team that must have SSO pays $2,320 a year on Tuskr and $7,188 on Testmo at monthly list. The gap closes as the band fills.
- Tuskr meters volume by plan; Testmo publishes no caps. Tuskr Team allows 50 projects, 50,000 test cases, 250 runs per project and 100 requirements; Enterprise tops out at 250 projects, 250,000 test cases and 1,000 runs per project. Testmo lists “Unlimited test cases, plans, runs, milestones, results” and “Unlimited automation results” on every plan, including the $59 one. The caps have a price: a ten-person team that outgrows 100 requirements moves to Tuskr Business at $1,500 a year, which is above Testmo Team’s $1,188.
- Exploratory sessions have their own module in Testmo and no documented equivalent in Tuskr. Testmo treats an exploratory session as a separate object from a test run. A session carries a mission, an estimate, an assignee and a configuration, and testers build a timed log of notes and status-tagged results. Sessions are included on all three plans. Tuskr’s features page and public roadmap do not mention exploratory or session-based testing; its execution model is test runs built from scripted cases.
- Tuskr states ISO 27001 and SOC 2; Testmo says it holds no certifications of its own. Tuskr’s security page states “ISO 27001 — Certified for information security management” and a SOC 2 audit under AICPA standards. Testmo’s security page answers the question directly: “Testmo itself does not hold certifications as of now”, pointing instead to the compliance programmes of Amazon AWS and Microsoft Azure. If your procurement process asks the vendor for its own certificate, only one of these two can supply it today.
What Are Tuskr and Testmo?
Tuskr Cloud Test Management
Tuskr is a cloud test management tool organised as projects, test suites, sections and test cases, with test plans that generate multiple runs, bulk result entry and PDF status reports. It is built for QA teams that want manual testing, requirements and defects in one place: a requirements module links to test cases, built-in issue tracking shipped in July 2026, and an npm CLI imports JUnit XML results. Licensing is per named user per year across Free, Team, Business and Enterprise, each with published caps. Tuskr runs on Google Cloud in the United States and publishes no self-hosted option.
Testmo Test Management
Testmo is a cloud test management tool that handles manual test cases, exploratory sessions and automated test results as three parallel activities inside each project. Test cases live in a folder-based repository with configurable templates, custom fields and workflow states, and automation runs arrive through an npm CLI. It is sold as three monthly plans priced by band of activated users, with no published limits on projects or data. Testmo runs on AWS in the US east region and states that it does not offer an on-premise edition.
Tuskr vs Testmo: Feature-by-Feature Comparison
Test Case Authoring: BDD, Workflow States and AI
Testmo has the wider authoring toolkit. It ships a Test Case (BDD) template, Gherkin syntax highlighting in every rich-text field, and configurable workflow states that default to Draft, Under Review, Rejected, Active and Retired. Tuskr’s roadmap lists a test case approval workflow as in progress and .feature file import as backlog, so neither is available yet. On AI, Tuskr’s assistant creates test cases, edits them in bulk and builds test runs, using OpenAI. Testmo generates test cases with AI on every plan, while its AI update and optimisation features are marked “Coming soon!”.
Automation Results and CI Pipelines
Both tools take the same input: an npm-installed CLI that reads JUnit XML. Tuskr’s import-junit-xml command uploads results with attachments and creates the run, suites, sections and cases if they do not exist. Testmo’s automation:run:submit does more around the file. Runs are grouped by source for comparison over time, parallel CI jobs report as threads, and the CLI can capture console output and timings. Testmo also documents six CI services, including GitHub Actions, GitLab CI/CD and Jenkins, and reports most-failed, slow and flaky tests. Testmo wins this dimension.
Requirements Traceability and Coverage
Tuskr has a native requirements module: requirements link to multiple test cases and results update requirement status automatically. The count is capped at 25, 100, 250 or 500 by plan. Testmo has no separate requirements object. You add issue IDs from Jira, GitHub or GitLab to cases, runs, milestones and sessions, and the Requirements Coverage & Traceability report reads those links. That report sits in the Reporting Center, which starts at Business. Teams with requirements already in Jira suit Testmo’s approach; teams without a requirements tracker get more from Tuskr.
Defect Tracking and Jira
Testmo’s Jira Cloud integration lets testers file bugs through Jira’s native New Issue dialog, so custom fields and Jira add-ons behave as they do in Jira. Its free Marketplace app, rebuilt on Atlassian Forge, shows linked tests and results inside Jira, and Jira Server and Data Center get a link-based integration. Tuskr creates a Jira issue when a test fails and marks the case for retest once the bug is fixed, a loop it also documents for GitHub and GitLab. It additionally includes its own issue tracker, capped at 1,000 issues per project on Team. Both keep test cases in their own application rather than as Jira issues.
API Quotas, Webhooks and Machine Accounts
Tuskr publishes exact API numbers: 1,200, 2,400 or 4,800 calls per hour by plan, and no API on Free. Webhooks fire when a result is added, changed or deleted, limited to 2, 3 or 5 by plan. Testmo includes its REST API on every plan and documents throttling rather than a quota: a 429 response with a Retry-After header. Business and Enterprise allow unlimited API-only users that are not counted toward the band, so CI service accounts cost nothing. Its plan comparison marks webhooks “Coming Soon” and an official MCP server “Beta”; Tuskr does not document an MCP server.
Tuskr vs Testmo Pricing Comparison
Prices below were read from each vendor’s public pricing page on 17 September 2026, in USD. See Tuskr’s pricing page for its full limit table.
| Tuskr | Testmo | |
|---|---|---|
| Free Plan | Up to 5 users; 5 projects, 1K test cases, 100 runs/project; no API, webhooks, SSO, 2FA or audit trail | None listed |
| Trial | 15 days, no credit card | 21 days |
| Entry Paid | Team: $90 per user per year | Team: $59/month (5 users) or $99/month (10 users); 10-user maximum |
| Mid | Business: $150 per user per year; adds audit trail and 2FA | Business: $249/month (15 users), then $399/month per 25; adds Reporting Center, custom RBAC, API-only users |
| Top | Enterprise: $290 per user per year; adds SSO | Enterprise: $599/month per 25 users; adds SSO, 2FA, audit log, automation launching |
| Minimum Seats | 5 on every paid plan | None; you pay for the whole band |
| Monthly Billing | $9 / $15 / $29 per user per month; yearly billing labelled “Save 16%” | Prices above are the monthly rates; 15% off list for annual Business and Enterprise plans |
| Payment | Credit card only; no refunds | Card monthly; card, wire transfer or purchase order for annual |
Yearly totals, using Tuskr’s annual prices and twelve times Testmo’s monthly list price:
| Users | Tuskr Team | Tuskr Business | Tuskr Enterprise (SSO) | Testmo without SSO | Testmo Enterprise (SSO) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | $450 | $750 | $1,450 | $708 (Team) | $7,188 |
| 10 | $900 | $1,500 | $2,900 | $1,188 (Team) | $7,188 |
| 15 | $1,350 | $2,250 | $4,350 | $2,988 (Business) | $7,188 |
| 25 | $2,250 | $3,750 | $7,250 | $4,788 (Business) | $7,188 |
| 50 | $4,500 | $7,500 | $14,500 | $9,576 (Business) | $14,376 |
List-price arithmetic, not a quote
Testmo’s 15% annual discount brings Business for 25 users to $4,069.80 and Enterprise for 25 to $6,109.80. On these totals, Tuskr Team is below Testmo at every size, and Tuskr Business is below it except at 5 users and at 8 to 10. With SSO required, Testmo is cheaper only near the top of a band: from 25 users on these totals, or from 22 when its annual discount is applied.
Pros and Cons of Tuskr vs Testmo
Tuskr
Pros
- $90 per user per year on Team, or $9 monthly, below Testmo’s list price at every team size in the table above
- Free plan for up to 5 users, with 5 projects and 1,000 test cases
- Native requirements module and built-in issue tracking, so coverage does not depend on an external tracker
- States ISO 27001 certification and a SOC 2 audit on its security page
Cons
- Caps on projects, test cases, runs and requirements on every plan; the pricing page does not explain how runs are counted
- SSO requires Enterprise at $290 per user; audit trail and 2FA require Business
- No documented exploratory sessions; test case approval and .feature import are not yet shipped
- JUnit XML is the only documented result format, and payment is by credit card only with a five-seat minimum
Testmo
Pros
- Unlimited projects, test cases, runs and automation results from the $59 plan upward
- Exploratory sessions with missions, status-tagged notes and time tracking on every plan
- Automation runs with sources, parallel threads and console capture, plus guides for six CI services
- Annual billing by purchase order or wire transfer, with monthly changes to plan and headcount
Cons
- SSO, 2FA and the audit log all require Enterprise, a minimum of $7,188 a year at monthly list
- Band pricing charges for empty seats: 11 users pay the 15-user price, 16 pay the 25-user price
- No free plan listed, and Testmo states that it holds no certifications of its own
- Webhooks are “Coming Soon”, the MCP server is “Beta”, and two of three AI features are unreleased
Who Should Use Tuskr vs Testmo?
Choose Tuskr If…
- You have 5 to about 20 testers, mostly scripted manual testing, and volumes inside the Team or Business caps
- You need SSO for fewer than about 20 people and do not want to pay for a 25-user band
- You want requirements and defects managed inside the test tool rather than in Jira
- Your security review asks for the vendor’s own ISO 27001 or SOC 2 evidence
Choose Testmo If…
- Exploratory, session-based testing is a regular part of your process
- Your pipelines submit results on every build, often from parallel jobs, and you do not want a runs-per-project cap
- You have close to 10 or close to 25 users, so the band is full and the per-head cost is lowest
- Your finance team buys software by purchase order or wire transfer
Look elsewhere if…
You need self-hosting or a choice of data region. Testmo states it has no on-premise edition, Tuskr publishes no self-hosted option, and both name only United States hosting.
Migration and Switching Considerations
Test cases move between these two by CSV. Testmo exports cases to CSV and Excel, plus a full JSON export that excludes file attachments. Tuskr imports UTF-8 CSV at a maximum of 1,000 test cases per import, so a large Testmo repository goes in as several batches. In the other direction, Tuskr exports CSV, and Testmo’s import wizard maps columns to fields and handles test cases that span multiple rows. Expect to leave run history behind: Testmo’s own migration guide says most teams do not migrate old results.
From TestRail the routes differ. Testmo imports TestRail XML exports, without attachments, while Tuskr connects to the TestRail API and copies projects, cases, custom fields, users and roles, as described in its TestRail migration guide.
Is Tuskr the Right Fit for Your Team?
Start with how your team works, because that rules Tuskr out before price does. If testers work from charters and session notes, Testmo has a module for that and Tuskr documents nothing comparable. If your CI creates a run on every commit, Tuskr’s cap of 250 to 1,000 runs per project deserves a hard look during the trial. If you must pay by purchase order, Tuskr takes credit cards only.
Where Tuskr fits is the team that wants to pay for exactly the seats it uses. Twelve testers cost $1,080 a year on Team, with 50,000 test cases, 50 projects and the REST API at 1,200 calls per hour. The same twelve cost $2,988 on Testmo, because the eleventh user leaves the $99 band. If that team needs SSO, Tuskr Enterprise is $3,480 against $7,188. Requirements, issue tracking and integrations with Jira, GitHub, GitLab, Slack and Microsoft Teams are included.
Free plan for up to 5 users and a 15-day trial
Check plan caps against your volumes before you buy.
Tuskr gives us a well-structured test case database that makes quality coverage visible and measurable. When our Azure pipeline completes a run, the results are automatically sent through the Playwright integration and uploaded to Tuskr as a Test Run, giving our team a clear and centralized view of test execution and product quality.
Tuskr or Testmo: Which Is Better?
5–20, Scripted + JUnit: Tuskr
$900 a year for ten users against $1,188, and $1,350 for fifteen against $2,988, as long as the Team caps hold.
Exploratory + Heavy CI: Testmo
Unlimited runs and automation results, and at a full 10-user band its premium over Tuskr Team is $288 a year.
SSO Mandatory: Depends on Headcount
Tuskr wins below roughly 20 users ($2,900 for ten against $7,188). Testmo wins at a full 25-user band, where $7,188 undercuts Tuskr’s $7,250.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper for a 10-person QA team, Tuskr or Testmo?
Tuskr Team is cheaper: 10 users cost $900 a year against $1,188 for Testmo Team at twelve times its $99 monthly price, or $90 against $99 month to month. The order reverses if the team outgrows Tuskr Team’s caps, because Tuskr Business is $1,500 for the same ten people. With SSO required, Tuskr Enterprise is $2,900 and Testmo Enterprise is $7,188.
Which plan includes SSO in Tuskr and in Testmo?
Both reserve it for the top plan. Tuskr marks Single Sign-On as Enterprise-only at $290 per user per year, using SAML 2.0 with Google, Okta, Azure AD and OneLogin. Testmo lists SAML SSO under Enterprise at $599 a month per 25 users, alongside two-factor enforcement and the audit log.
Does Tuskr support exploratory test sessions the way Testmo does?
Not according to its published materials. Testmo has a Sessions area where each session has a mission, an assignee and a log of notes and results. Tuskr’s features page and roadmap do not mention session-based testing, so confirm before assuming an equivalent.
Do Tuskr and Testmo both accept JUnit XML from a CI pipeline?
Yes. Each has an npm-installed CLI that reads JUnit XML: Tuskr’s import-junit-xml command and Testmo’s automation:run:submit. Testmo adds sources, parallel threads and console-output capture, plus examples for six CI services. Tuskr documents Playwright and Cypress how-tos.
Does Testmo have a free plan like Tuskr's?
No free plan appears on Testmo’s pricing page; its sign-up page offers a 21-day free trial. Tuskr’s Free plan covers up to 5 users with 5 projects, 1,000 test cases and 100 runs per project, without API access or webhooks. For Testmo’s pricing against a per-seat rival, see the Qase vs Testmo comparison.
