This Tuskr vs TestCollab comparison covers who executes tests, SSO and hosting tiers, BDD and Jira links, migration paths and list prices so web QA leads can weigh AI-driven execution against licence cost. TestCollab Elite bundles QA Copilot, which trains against your app URL and runs plain-English cases; Tuskr records manual runs and JUnit XML from your pipeline and lists $90 to $290 per user per year with a free tier.
Headline monthly rates hide the product split: TestCollab sells test management that also runs tests, while Tuskr never executes automation itself. Premium lists at $348 per user per year versus $90 on Tuskr Team, and mandatory SSO pairs Tuskr Enterprise at $290 against TestCollab Enterprise with no public price, while QA Copilot has no Tuskr equivalent. The sections below compare execution models, security gates and migration before you commit to either monthly bill.
Tuskr vs TestCollab: Which Test Management Tool Should You Choose?
-
Who executes the tests. TestCollab Elite bundles QA Copilot to run plain-English cases against web apps. Tuskr records manual runs and JUnit XML from your pipeline.
-
Free tier versus monthly seats. Tuskr keeps a free plan and $90–$290 per user per year. TestCollab retired its free plan and sells from $29 per user per month.
Tuskr vs TestCollab Side-by-Side Comparison
| Tuskr | TestCollab | |
|---|---|---|
| Best For | Manual-first web QA teams that run their own automation and want a low per-user cost | Web QA teams that want AI to generate and execute tests, or need private hosting |
| Starting Price | Team — $90 per user per year, or $9 per user per month billed monthly; 5-user minimum | Premium — US$29 per user per month billed annually ($35 billed monthly) |
| Free Plan / Trial | Free forever plan for up to 5 users; 15-day trial, no credit card | No free plan (retired 5 August 2025); 14-day trial |
| Smallest Paid Purchase | 5 users | 2 users |
| Deployment | Cloud only, hosted on Google Cloud in the United States | Cloud on AWS; Enterprise adds single-tenant hosting or self-hosting in your own AWS account, EU or US region |
| Jira Integration | Integration: creates Jira issues from failures and flags the case for retest when the bug is fixed; not a Jira app | Free Forge app on the Atlassian Marketplace manages test cases inside Jira; defect push works without the app |
| API | REST API on paid plans and trial only; 1,200 to 4,800 calls per hour by plan | REST API with per-user tokens; rate limits exist but are not published |
| Automation Support | CLI imports JUnit XML | CLI uploads JUnit XML or Mochawesome JSON, syncs Gherkin feature files, and can fail a build on a quality gate |
| AI Test Execution | Not documented; the AI assistant writes and edits cases and builds runs | QA Copilot runs plain-English cases against web applications (Elite and above) |
| Single Sign-On | SAML 2.0, Enterprise plan only ($290 per user per year) | OIDC with Okta or Microsoft Entra ID, Enterprise plan only (quote-only); no SAML |
| Key Differentiator | A free tier, and a published price on every plan including the SSO tier | An AI agent that executes tests, plus an MCP server for coding assistants |
| Main Limitation | Plan caps on test cases, projects and requirements; SSO only on Enterprise; JUnit XML is the only documented result format | No free plan; SSO, audit log, 2FA and data residency all require a quote-only Enterprise plan |
Quick verdict
The decision turns on one thing: who, or what, executes your tests. If the answer should be an AI agent, or if Gherkin files in Git and hosting in your own AWS account matter, TestCollab is the tool. If testers and your own frameworks do the work and you only need it tracked, Tuskr does that from $90 per user per year, and even its SSO tier has a published price.
Key Differences Between Tuskr and TestCollab
- QA Copilot executes tests; Tuskr only records them. TestCollab describes QA Copilot as an “AI based, NoCode solution” that removes “manual script writing to test web applications”. You supply a URL, it processes each step of a case in sequence, and it reaches your environment from a fixed IP address you can whitelist. Its help centre scopes it to “testing of web applications”, and training consumes a token balance whose price is not published. Tuskr documents no execution engine. Its AI assistant creates cases, edits them in bulk and builds test runs; people or your CI supply the results.
- TestCollab retired its free plan; Tuskr still has one. TestCollab announced on 7 May 2025 that its free plan would end on 5 August 2025. Its entry point is now a 14-day trial, then Premium at US$29 per user per month billed annually. Tuskr keeps a free forever plan for up to 5 users, capped at 5 projects, 1,000 test cases and 25 requirements, with no API access. TestCollab Premium, by contrast, lists “Unlimited Test Cases & Runs”. The catch on Tuskr’s side is the step up: its paid plans carry a 5-user minimum, whereas TestCollab sells seat packages from 2 users.
- Both gate SSO to the top tier, but the protocol and the price tag differ. Tuskr includes single sign-on only in Enterprise, at a published $290 per user per year. It is SAML 2.0 with Google, Okta, Azure AD and OneLogin; SCIM is not documented. Two-factor authentication and the audit trail start one tier lower, on Business at $150. TestCollab places SSO, SCIM, the audit log, two-factor authentication and password policies in Enterprise as well, but that plan is quote-only. Its SSO page answers “Do you support SAML?” with “No. Sign-in is OIDC based with Microsoft Entra ID and Okta.” The protocols do not overlap, so ask your identity team which one it accepts first.
- Only TestCollab can run inside your own AWS account. TestCollab Enterprise offers a managed single-tenant instance or self-hosting “in Your Own AWS Account”, with data residency in EU (Frankfurt) or US (N. Virginia). The vendor does not yet ship binaries for other clouds or bare-metal servers. Tuskr is cloud-only; it publishes no self-hosted option, and its security page states United States hosting on Google Cloud. Both publish a SOC 2 audit, TestCollab specifying Type II, and Tuskr also lists ISO 27001 certification.
What Are Tuskr and TestCollab?
Tuskr Cloud Test Management
Tuskr is a cloud test management tool built around manual test execution. Projects contain test suites, suites contain sections, and sections contain test cases written in a rich-text editor with custom fields. Teams group cases into test plans, create several runs from one plan, record results in bulk and lock finished runs. It also includes requirements, built-in issue tracking, dashboards, burndown charts and timesheets. Automation enters through an npm-installed CLI that imports JUnit XML. Tuskr is sold per named user per year across a free plan and three paid plans, each with published usage caps, and it is cloud-only.
TestCollab Test Management
TestCollab is a test management platform that markets itself as a tool “for Humans and AI Agents”; the vendor’s homepage title and Atlassian Marketplace listing also spell the name Test Collab. It covers nested test suites, reusable steps, test plans with configurations, requirements traceability and custom reports. Around that core it adds QA Copilot for AI test generation and execution, an MCP server for coding assistants, Gherkin sync from Git and a Forge app for Jira. It is sold per named user across Premium, Elite and a quote-only Enterprise plan, hosted on AWS, with private deployment reserved for Enterprise.
Tuskr vs TestCollab: Feature-by-Feature Comparison
Test Case Authoring and Reuse
TestCollab documents more reuse mechanisms. Common steps are maintained “in one place”, whole suites can be referenced across projects so that updating the source keeps “every instance” synced, and version history supports reverting. Elite adds parameterised cases with datasets and a review-and-approval workflow. Tuskr documents version history of test assets, custom fields and spreadsheet import. Its roadmap lists test case approval as in progress, and it does not document shared steps or parameterised cases. TestCollab wins here, though two of its advantages sit on the $39 tier.
Getting CI Results In
Both vendors ship a Node-based CLI that can build the test library from a first upload. Tuskr’s import-junit-xml command creates the run, suites, sections and cases it does not find, and imports attachments. Tuskr documents no named CI plugins. TestCollab’s tc report accepts JUnit XML or Mochawesome JSON and matches results by an ID in the test name, such as [TC-42], or by normalised title. Its tc gate command fails a build that misses quality criteria, and the CLI repository carries pipeline examples for GitHub Actions, GitLab CI and Azure DevOps.
BDD Files and Access for AI Agents
This dimension belongs to TestCollab. Its tc sync command reads Gherkin .feature files from your Git repository, fingerprints each scenario with SHA-256 and syncs only changed content, so Git remains the source. Its MIT-licensed MCP server exposes 17 tools that let Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf or Codex CLI create and query cases, suites and test plans. On Tuskr’s roadmap, importing .feature files sits in the backlog, and Tuskr does not document an MCP server. TestCollab’s pricing page does not tie the CLI, BDD sync or MCP server to a plan; confirm in a trial.
Jira: An App Inside Jira Versus an Integration Beside It
TestCollab publishes a free Forge app that adds issue panels and test plan management inside Jira, while the test data stays in TestCollab. Its pricing FAQ says you pay only for Jira users who edit or delete test cases; everyone else can view the list in Jira without a licence. The Marketplace listing shows Jira Cloud hosting, and the OAuth connection for defects and requirements covers Jira Cloud, Data Center and Server. Tuskr integrates from outside: a failed case creates a Jira issue, and fixing the bug marks the case for retest.
Requirements and Traceability
The two tools source requirements differently. TestCollab Premium links items from Jira, GitLab, Azure DevOps, Asana and Pivotal Tracker into a live traceability matrix, and its built-in requirements manager arrives with Elite. Tuskr’s requirements are native on every plan: they link to multiple test cases, their status updates from test results, and an AI Analyze function reports missing coverage. An External ID field can hold a Jira key, which is a reference, not a documented sync. Tuskr limits requirements to between 25 and 500 depending on plan.
Planning, Time and Sharing Results Outside the Team
TestCollab’s test plan wizard sets scope and dates, chooses configurations such as browser and OS, and auto-distributes cases across testers. It predicts plan duration from historical run timing, and a plan summary or read-only dashboard can be shared with people who hold no licence. Tuskr treats time commercially: timesheets track time, costs and billing with multi-level approval, and clients get permission-controlled access to results. Agencies billing QA hours lean towards Tuskr; teams balancing workload across configurations lean towards TestCollab.
Tuskr vs TestCollab Pricing Comparison
Pricing below was checked on 17 September 2026 from each vendor’s public pricing page, in US dollars.
| Tuskr | TestCollab | |
|---|---|---|
| Free Plan | Free forever — up to 5 users, 5 projects, 1,000 test cases, no API | None; retired 5 August 2025 |
| Trial | 15 days, no credit card | 14 days |
| Entry Paid Tier | Team — $90 per user per year; $9 per user per month billed monthly | Premium — $29 per user per month billed annually; $35 billed monthly |
| Mid Tier | Business — $150 per user per year; $15 billed monthly. Adds 2FA and audit trail | Elite — $39 per user per month billed annually; $45 billed monthly. Adds QA Copilot |
| Top Tier | Enterprise — $290 per user per year; $29 billed monthly. Adds SAML SSO | Enterprise — quote only. Adds SSO, SCIM, audit log, 2FA, data residency, own-AWS hosting |
| Volume Pricing | None published | $21 (Premium) and $31 (Elite) per user per month at 50 users, billed annually; custom quote above 50 |
| Minimum Seats | 5 on paid plans | Seat packages start at 2 |
| Licence Type | Named, transferable | Named |
The Tuskr vs TestCollab price gap is structural. Tuskr prices per user per year against published usage caps (50,000 test cases on Team, 250,000 on Enterprise) and requires five seats. TestCollab prices per user per month with unlimited volume, sells packages from two seats and discounts as headcount rises. The table below compares yearly totals on annual billing for both.
| Scenario | Tuskr | TestCollab |
|---|---|---|
| 2 users | $0 on Free within its caps, or $450 (Team, 5-seat minimum) | $696 Premium; $936 Elite |
| 10 users | $900 Team; $1,500 Business; $2,900 Enterprise | Up to $3,480 Premium; up to $4,680 Elite |
| 50 users | $4,500 Team; $7,500 Business; $14,500 Enterprise | $12,600 Premium; $18,600 Elite |
List-price arithmetic, not a quote
TestCollab quotes its per-user rate at the headline level and at 50 users only, so the 10-user figures use the headline rate and are an upper bound. If SSO is mandatory, the honest pairing is Tuskr Enterprise at $290 per user per year against TestCollab Enterprise, which has no public price. If AI execution is the point, TestCollab Elite has no Tuskr equivalent at any price.
Pros and Cons of Tuskr vs TestCollab
Tuskr
Pros
- Free forever plan for up to 5 users, and a 15-day trial without a credit card
- $90 to $290 per user per year, against $348 a year for TestCollab Premium at its headline rate
- Every tier has a published price, including Enterprise with SAML SSO at $290 per user per year
- Timesheets with approval workflows, plus Harvest, Toggl and Everhour integrations
Cons
- Five-user minimum on paid plans, and every plan caps projects, test cases and requirements
- SSO requires Enterprise, and 2FA and the audit trail require Business or above
- Cloud-only, with United States hosting the only region stated
- JUnit XML is the only documented result format; .feature import is in the backlog
- Test case approval is not yet shipped; no MCP server or execution engine is documented
TestCollab
Pros
- QA Copilot generates test cases and runs plain-English cases against web applications
- Unlimited test cases, runs and run history from the Premium plan
- Gherkin sync from Git, an MCP server with 17 tools, and a CLI quality gate
- Enterprise options for single-tenant hosting, self-hosting on AWS and EU residency
Cons
- No free plan since 5 August 2025, and SSO, SCIM, audit log and 2FA require the quote-only Enterprise plan
- SSO is OIDC with Okta or Entra ID only; SAML is explicitly unsupported
- QA Copilot, approvals, parameterised cases and custom execution statuses start at the $39 Elite tier
- The price of QA Copilot’s token balance and the API rate limits are not published
Who Should Use Tuskr vs TestCollab?
Choose Tuskr If…
- Your testing is mostly manual and your automation already emits JUnit XML
- You are five people or fewer and want a free plan with no end date
- Your identity provider speaks SAML 2.0 and you want the SSO tier priced up front at $290 per user per year
- Your repository will stay under 250,000 test cases and 500 requirements
Choose TestCollab If…
- You want an AI agent to execute web regression cases without anyone writing scripts
- Your scenarios live as Gherkin .feature files in Git and must stay there
- You need EU data residency, a single-tenant instance or hosting in your own AWS account
- Developers and product owners want to view and link test cases without leaving Jira
Look elsewhere if…
You must self-host on bare metal or on a cloud other than AWS. TestCollab does not offer that today, and Tuskr publishes no self-hosted option.
Migration and Switching Considerations
Neither vendor documents a dedicated importer for the other, so the route in both directions is a spreadsheet. Tuskr imports test cases from UTF-8 CSV only, at most 1,000 per batch, creating suites and sections on the fly; TestCollab exports test cases to CSV and individual cases to PDF. In the other direction, TestCollab’s import wizard accepts CSV, XLS, XLSX and ODS and saves column mappings per project. Tuskr exports CSV.
Teams arriving from TestRail get different paths. Tuskr’s TestRail migration guide describes a direct API-based transfer of projects, cases, steps, custom fields, users and roles, excluding runs, history and attachments. TestCollab’s route is a TestRail CSV export with section hierarchy mapped to suites. Neither vendor documents run history or attachments moving through CSV.
Is Tuskr the Right Fit for Your Team?
If QA Copilot is the reason you opened this page, stay with TestCollab: Tuskr documents no agent that executes tests, no MCP server and no self-hosted edition, and Gherkin import is still in its backlog. A team that needs EU data residency or more than 500 tracked requirements will not fit inside Tuskr’s plans either.
Tuskr suits the web QA team whose automation already exists. If Playwright or Cypress runs in your pipeline, the Tuskr CLI imports the JUnit XML and creates missing cases. That costs $90 per user per year on Team, $150 on Business or $290 on Enterprise, with a 5-user minimum, against $348 per user per year for TestCollab Premium at its headline rate. Security controls are tiered, and Tuskr’s pricing page prices each tier: two-factor authentication and the audit trail arrive with Business, SAML 2.0 single sign-on with Enterprise. The security page lists ISO 27001 certification and a SOC 2 audit. See also Tuskr’s page for teams considering a TestCollab alternative.
Free plan for up to 5 users and a 15-day trial
No credit card required on the trial.
Tuskr gives us a well-structured test case database that makes quality coverage visible and measurable. When our Azure pipeline completes a run, the results are automatically sent through the Playwright integration and uploaded to Tuskr as a Test Run, giving our team a clear and centralized view of test execution and product quality.
Tuskr or TestCollab: Which Is Better?
AI Test Execution: TestCollab
QA Copilot, Gherkin sync and the MCP server have no documented counterpart in Tuskr, and Elite at $39 per user per month is the price of that capability.
Data Residency / Own AWS: TestCollab
Enterprise offers Frankfurt or N. Virginia residency and deployment in your own AWS account, while Tuskr is cloud-only in the United States.
Manual-First, Fixed Budget: Tuskr
Ten users cost $900 a year on Team against up to $3,480 on TestCollab Premium. Even Tuskr Enterprise lists at $2,900 for ten users. Teams of five or fewer can stay on Tuskr’s free plan.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does TestCollab still have a free plan?
No. TestCollab announced on 7 May 2025 that its free plan would end on 5 August 2025. Its current entry point is a 14-day trial, then Premium at US$29 per user per month billed annually. Tuskr has a free forever plan for up to 5 users.
Can Tuskr run automated tests the way QA Copilot does?
No. Tuskr does not document any test execution engine. Its AI assistant creates test cases, modifies them in bulk, and builds test runs, and automated results come in through the CLI’s JUnit XML import. QA Copilot, included from TestCollab’s Elite plan, converts plain-English cases into automation and runs them against web applications.
Which plan includes single sign-on in each tool?
The top tier in both. Tuskr includes SAML 2.0 single sign-on, with Google, Okta, Azure AD and OneLogin, only in Enterprise at $290 per user per year; two-factor authentication and the audit trail start at Business. TestCollab includes SSO only in its quote-only Enterprise plan, using OIDC with Okta or Microsoft Entra ID, and states that it does not support SAML.
Which is cheaper for a 10-person QA team, Tuskr or TestCollab?
Tuskr, on list prices. Ten users cost $900 per year on Tuskr Team, $1,500 on Business or $2,900 on Enterprise. TestCollab Premium at its headline rate of $29 per user per month billed annually comes to $3,480 per year, and Elite at $39 comes to $4,680. TestCollab discounts by team size, so treat those as upper bounds.
Does TestCollab store test cases inside Jira?
No. The test data stays in TestCollab; its free Forge app on the Atlassian Marketplace adds panels inside Jira where users create, edit and link test cases. Tuskr is not a Jira app; it creates Jira issues from failed tests and marks cases for retest when the bug is fixed.
