This Tuskr vs QMetry comparison covers regulatory controls, audit evidence, hosting, licensing, automation and cost so QA leads can weigh Part 11 workflows against purchasing friction. QMetry Test Management documents electronic signatures, Server deployment and concurrent licences but publishes Contact Sales pricing; Tuskr lists $90 to $290 per user per year, a free plan and no shipped e-signatures or approval workflow.
Advice that says pick the cheaper per-seat cloud tool fails regulated teams and frustrates buyers who need a number before a sales call. Missing 21 CFR Part 11 e-signatures or EU-hosted data rules QMetry in and Tuskr out, while a manager with a card still has to climb to Business ($150) or Enterprise ($290) for audit trail, 2FA and SSO that QMetry lists in its base edition. The sections below separate SmartBear’s standalone QMetry from its Jira app and map controls to published Tuskr tiers.
Tuskr vs QMetry: Which Test Management Tool Should You Choose?
-
Regulatory controls versus published prices. QMetry documents 21 CFR Part 11 e-signatures, Server deployment and concurrent licences. Tuskr lists $90–$290 per user per year and a free plan, with no shipped approval workflow or e-signatures.
-
Where security features sit. QMetry lists SSO/LDAP in its base edition; e-signatures need Enterprise Plus. Tuskr adds audit trail and 2FA at Business ($150) and SSO only on Enterprise ($290).
Tuskr vs QMetry Side-by-Side Comparison
| Tuskr | QMetry Test Management | |
|---|---|---|
| Best For | Small and mid-sized teams that want a published price, self-serve signup and cloud hosting | Regulated or large QA organisations that need signed approvals, self-hosting or concurrent licences |
| Starting Price | Team — $90 per user per year, 5-user minimum | Not publicly published (checked 17 September 2026); both editions are Contact Sales |
| Free Plan / Trial | Free plan for up to 5 users; 15-day trial, no credit card | No free plan; trial with no credit card, stated as 14 days on the product page and 15 days on the sign-up form |
| Deployment | Cloud only, Google Cloud, United States | Cloud or Server; EU hosting offered |
| E-Signatures and Approvals | Not documented; test case approval is “In Progress” on the roadmap | E-signature module with up to 5 approval levels, listed under Enterprise Plus |
| SSO, 2FA and Audit Trail | Audit trail and 2FA on Business ($150/user/year) and Enterprise; SSO on Enterprise only ($290/user/year) | SSO/LDAP listed in the base Enterprise edition; audit log report, two-step authentication and SCIM 2.0 documented; no price published |
| Licence Model | Named, transferable | Named or concurrent |
| Jira Integration | Creates Jira issues from failed tests; retest when fixed | Requires a QMetry app in Jira; epics and stories sync in real time, bugs sync both ways |
| API | REST; paid plans and trial only; 1,200–4,800 calls/hour by plan | REST; cloud quota of 1,000/hour and 10,000/day per instance, plus 500 Automation API calls/day |
| Automation Support | JUnit XML through an npm CLI | Cucumber, TestNG, JUnit, Robot, HP UFT, Pytest BDD, QAF; Jenkins, Bamboo, Maven and Gradle plugins |
| Key Differentiator | Every price and plan limit is on a public page | 21 CFR Part 11 e-signatures and a Server edition |
| Main Limitation | No self-hosting, no shipped approval workflow; SSO only on the $290 tier | No published price; e-signatures sit in the higher edition |
Quick verdict
Choose QMetry if signed approvals, a Server edition, EU hosting or concurrent licences appear anywhere on your requirements list, because Tuskr documents none of them. Choose Tuskr if you want a printed price and a self-serve start, and you have checked which tier your controls need: audit trail and two-factor authentication begin at Business ($150 per user per year), SSO at Enterprise ($290).
Key Differences Between Tuskr and QMetry
- QMetry ships a Part 11 e-signature module; Tuskr’s approval workflow is still being built. SmartBear states that QMetry’s “eSignature module is developed in accordance with key regulatory guidelines like 21 CFR Part 11”, and the pricing page lists an “e-signature module with multi-level approval workflow” under Enterprise Plus. Tuskr’s public roadmap shows Test Case Approval as “In Progress”, and neither its roadmap nor its security page mentions electronic signatures or Part 11. For a medical device, pharma or clinical software team, that gap decides the purchase.
- Tuskr prints its prices; both QMetry editions end in a Contact Sales button. Tuskr lists $90, $150 and $290 per user per year for Team, Business and Enterprise, each with a 5-user minimum, plus a free plan for up to 5 users. QMetry’s pricing page names two editions, Enterprise and Enterprise Plus, describes what each contains, and shows no figure for either. Tuskr’s controls are tiered but priced: audit trail and 2FA start at Business, SSO at Enterprise. Budgeting QMetry starts with a sales conversation.
- QMetry runs on your servers or in the EU; Tuskr runs on Google Cloud in the United States. QMetry is “Available On: Cloud | Server”, its documentation lists CentOS 7.x and RHEL 7.x/8.x for Server deployment, and the pricing page advertises hosting “Locally in European Union to Meet The Compliance Needs”. Tuskr is cloud-only: its security page says servers are “hosted in the Google Cloud Infrastructure in the United States”, and it publishes no self-hosted option or region choice. If policy keeps test data inside your network, or inside the EU, only QMetry has a documented answer.
- QMetry sells concurrent licences; Tuskr sells named seats only. QMetry documents two licence types: named, which “cannot be shared”, and concurrent, where active users can exceed licences purchased. The documentation’s example is a 1:3 ratio, with 20 concurrent licences serving up to 60 active users and 20 logged in at once. Tuskr uses named licences only, so five licences means five login accounts, though a licence can be transferred when someone leaves. For organisations with many occasional testers, that is a cost lever Tuskr does not offer.
What Are Tuskr and QMetry?
Tuskr Cloud Test Management
Tuskr is a cloud test management tool sold per named user across a free plan and three paid plans. Test cases live in a project, suite and section hierarchy with a rich-text editor and custom fields. Runs support bulk result entry, locking and PDF status reports. Test plans, issue tracking and requirements are included, and an AI assistant built on OpenAI creates and edits test cases. Audit trail and two-factor authentication start on Business ($150 per user per year); SAML single sign-on is Enterprise-only ($290). Tuskr integrates with Jira, GitHub, GitLab, Azure DevOps and Linear among others, and is not a Jira app.
QMetry Test Management
QMetry Test Management is an enterprise test management product owned by SmartBear, which announced the acquisition on 3 December 2024; qmetry.com now redirects to SmartBear’s site. It is sold in two quote-only editions on Cloud or Server, with named or concurrent licences. The Enterprise edition lists requirements, test cases, test suites, version control, parameterization, SSO/LDAP and REST APIs. Enterprise Plus adds advanced reporting, extended support, migration from ALM and TestRail, and the e-signature module. QMetry Intelligence adds AI test case generation and a flaky score. QMetry Test Management for Jira is a separate Atlassian Marketplace app.
Tuskr vs QMetry: Feature-by-Feature Comparison
How Approvals and Signatures Work in Practice
QMetry wins this dimension outright, because Tuskr documents no equivalent today. QMetry’s approval workflow “is available only with the eSignature package and can be enabled per project”, and once enabled it cannot be disabled. You can define up to 5 approval levels, and approval from any one approver at a level moves the item on. Approving a test case locks that version, so an edit means a new version that returns to review. With Part 11 Compliance on, QMetry demands authentication before any execution status change.
Audit Log and Change History
QMetry documents more here, and Tuskr gates its audit trail by plan. QMetry’s Audit Log Report captures create, update, delete, move, copy, archive and clone events with actor and entity key, and can be emailed as a scheduled PDF. A separate Change Log Report shows each change’s old value, new value and user. Tuskr’s features page describes version history of test assets “with complete audit trails”. Its pricing page includes Audit Trail on Business ($150 per user per year) and Enterprise ($290) only, and documents no filters, scheduling or retention for it.
Single Sign-On, Provisioning and Two-Factor
QMetry supports SAML and LDAP, with SSO/LDAP listed in the base edition. Its documentation names Okta as the currently supported SAML provider, carries an Azure AD guide, and covers SCIM 2.0 provisioning with Okta plus two-step authentication by authenticator app. Tuskr documents SAML 2.0 with Google, Okta, Azure AD and OneLogin, in optional or required mode, on the Enterprise plan only at $290 per user per year; SCIM is not documented. Two-factor authentication arrives one tier lower, on Business at $150. Tuskr’s SSO tier has a public price; QMetry’s adds SCIM.
Certifications and Where They Apply
On attestations the two are close. SmartBear’s trust centre announces a “SOC 2 and ISAE 3000 Type 2 Report covering QMetry Test Management (QTM)” and the Jira app for 1 August 2024 to 31 July 2025, and shows ISO/IEC 27001 and GDPR badges at company level. Tuskr’s security page states ISO 27001 certification, a SOC 2 audit under AICPA standards, and EU and UK GDPR compliance, without stating the SOC 2 report type.
Test Case Design: Versions, Reuse and Parameters
QMetry documents more authoring depth. It covers test case and requirement versions, shareable test cases reused across folders, test data parameterization with data grids, and creating test cases from a BDD feature file. Tuskr documents a suite and section hierarchy, rich-text steps with pasted images, custom fields and version history. It does not document shared steps or parameterised test data, and importing Cucumber “.feature” files sits in its roadmap backlog.
Automation Intake and API Quotas
QMetry reads more formats; Tuskr’s API allowance is larger on paper. QMetry documents result imports from Cucumber, TestNG, JUnit, Robot, HP UFT, Pytest BDD and the QMetry Automation Framework, with Jenkins, Bamboo, Maven and Gradle plugins. Tuskr documents JUnit XML only, imported by the npm-installed Tuskr CLI, which creates runs, suites and cases as needed. Playwright and Cypress emit JUnit XML; TestNG or Robot output would need converting. QMetry Cloud allots 1,000 Open API calls per hour, 10,000 per day and 500 Automation API calls per day, per instance. Tuskr allots 1,200, 2,400 or 4,800 calls per hour by plan, and none on Free. With Part 11 Compliance on, QMetry restricts automation result uploads through the Automation API.
Jira: An Integration on One Side, a Choice of Two Products on the Other
Tuskr’s Jira integration creates an issue when a test fails and marks the case for retest when the bug is fixed. Standalone QMetry requires installing a QMetry app in Jira, then syncs epics and stories into its Requirements module in real time and bugs in both directions. SmartBear also sells a Jira-native app, QMetry Test Management for Jira; its product page does not name the e-signature module, so verify before assuming parity.
Tuskr vs QMetry Pricing Comparison
Pricing below was checked on 17 September 2026 from each vendor’s public pricing page and the Atlassian Marketplace, in USD.
| Tuskr | QMetry Test Management | |
|---|---|---|
| Free Plan | Up to 5 users, 5 projects, 1,000 test cases, 25 requirements, no API | None published |
| Trial | 15 days, no credit card | No credit card; 14 days on the product page, 15 days on the sign-up form |
| Entry Paid Tier | Team — $90/user/year, or $9/user/month billed monthly; no SSO, 2FA or audit trail | Enterprise (lists SSO/LDAP) — Contact Sales |
| Mid Tier | Business — $150/user/year, or $15/user/month; adds audit trail and 2FA | — |
| Top Tier | Enterprise — $290/user/year, or $29/user/month; adds SSO | Enterprise Plus (adds e-signatures) — Contact Sales |
| Minimum Seats | 5 on every paid plan | Not published |
| Licence Type | Named | Named or concurrent |
| Payment | Credit card only | Not published |
The structural difference in Tuskr vs QMetry pricing is disclosure. As list-price arithmetic on yearly billing, 10 users cost $900 a year on Team, $1,500 on Business and $2,900 on Enterprise, and 25 users cost $2,250, $3,750 and $7,250. Compare like tiers: QMetry lists SSO/LDAP in its base edition, so a Tuskr buyer who needs SSO should budget the Enterprise figures, and one who needs only audit trail and 2FA the Business figures. Standalone QMetry publishes no number to set beside them.
The one place QMetry prices are public is the Jira app. On the Atlassian Marketplace, QMetry Test Management for Jira Cloud is $0 for up to 10 users, $1,045 a year at the 25-user tier, $2,090 at 50 and $4,180 at 100; Data Center starts at $1,822 a year for 50 users. Atlassian requires the app tier to match your Jira user tier, so that count is everyone in Jira, not only testers.
Pros and Cons of Tuskr vs QMetry
Tuskr
Pros
- Publishes three per-user prices, every plan limit and a free plan for up to 5 users
- Control tiers carry public prices: audit trail and 2FA at $150 per user per year, SSO at $290
- Security page states ISO 27001 certification and a SOC 2 audit
- 1,200–4,800 API calls per hour by plan, above QMetry Cloud’s documented 1,000
Cons
- No e-signatures documented, and test case approval is not yet shipped
- SSO is Enterprise-only ($290 per user per year); Free and Team have no audit trail or 2FA
- Cloud-only, hosted in the United States, with no region choice
- Requirements capped at 500 on the top plan; JUnit XML is the only documented result format
QMetry
Pros
- E-signature module built to 21 CFR Part 11 guidelines, with up to 5 approval levels
- Cloud and Server editions, plus EU hosting
- Named or concurrent licences; SSO/LDAP in the base edition and SCIM 2.0 documented
- Seven documented automation result sources, plus Jenkins, Bamboo, Maven and Gradle plugins
Cons
- No price published for either edition, and no free plan
- E-signatures are listed under Enterprise Plus, the higher edition
- Cloud API quota is shared per instance: 1,000 calls/hour, 500 Automation API calls/day
- Part 11 mode restricts automation result uploads through the Automation API
Who Should Use Tuskr vs QMetry?
Choose Tuskr If…
- You have five or more testers and need a number for the budget this week
- Your security review asks for an audit trail and 2FA (Business, $150 per user per year) or SAML SSO (Enterprise, $290), plus ISO 27001 and SOC 2 attestations
- Your automation already emits JUnit XML, as Playwright and Cypress do
- You want a free plan to pilot on before any purchase
Choose QMetry If…
- Test cases or executions must be signed under 21 CFR Part 11 or a similar regime
- Test data must run on your own servers, or be hosted in the EU
- You have many occasional users and concurrent licensing would cut seat count
- Your frameworks report in TestNG, Cucumber, Robot or HP UFT formats
- You trace more than 500 requirements (the cap on Tuskr’s top plan), or need parameterised and shareable test cases
Look elsewhere if…
You want tests managed inside Jira. QMetry’s separate Jira app is one candidate, and our TestRail vs QMetry comparison covers another standalone option.
Migration and Switching Considerations
QMetry is the better-equipped importer. It accepts XLS, XLSX and CSV for requirements, test cases, test suites, executions and issues, and exports test cases as XLSX or CSV. It also documents a migration tool for TestRail, HP ALM, Zephyr Squad, Xray and qTest, whose file and licence come from SmartBear’s Professional Services team. Tuskr is not among its sources.
Tuskr imports test cases from UTF-8 CSV only, at most 1,000 per batch, and exports CSV. Its one direct migration path is from TestRail, described in the TestRail migration guide. Moving between the two therefore means CSV in either direction. Tuskr’s import documentation does not cover version history, approval records or parameter grids, so archive signed records before leaving QMetry.
Is Tuskr the Right Fit for Your Team?
Teams that answer to 21 CFR Part 11 should stop at QMetry. Tuskr documents no electronic signatures, no self-hosted or EU-hosted option and no concurrent licences, and the approval workflow on its roadmap is not a Part 11 module.
Tuskr suits the team whose controls are lighter and whose buying process is a manager with a card. Know the tier before you start. The Free and Team plans ($90 per user per year) carry none of the three controls discussed on this page. Audit trail and two-factor authentication start at Business, $150 per user per year, and SAML SSO needs Enterprise at $290.
With a 5-user minimum, ten people cost $1,500 a year on Business or $2,900 on Enterprise at list price, or $15 and $29 per user billed monthly. The security page states ISO 27001 and SOC 2. Plan caps are on the Tuskr pricing page too, so check the 500-requirement ceiling on Enterprise against your own numbers.
Free plan for up to 5 users and a 15-day trial
No credit card required on the trial.
Tuskr gives us a well-structured test case database that makes quality coverage visible and measurable. When our Azure pipeline completes a run, the results are automatically sent through the Playwright integration and uploaded to Tuskr as a Test Run, giving our team a clear and centralized view of test execution and product quality.
Tuskr or QMetry: Which Is Better?
21 CFR Part 11: QMetry
It has the e-signature module, forced multi-level approvals and an Approval Workflow Report; Tuskr has none of those shipped.
Self-Host or EU Data: QMetry
Tuskr is cloud-only in the United States.
Published Price, Start This Week: Tuskr
A free plan and a published price for each control, $150 per user per year for audit trail and 2FA and $290 for SSO, where QMetry offers a quote.
Automation Format: Depends
JUnit XML pipelines work with either; TestNG, Robot or UFT output points to QMetry.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does Tuskr support 21 CFR Part 11 e-signatures the way QMetry does?
No. Tuskr’s roadmap and security pages do not mention electronic signatures or 21 CFR Part 11, and its Test Case Approval workflow is marked “In Progress”. QMetry documents an eSignature package with up to 5 approval levels, locked approved versions and a Part 11 Compliance setting that forces authentication before execution status changes. It is listed under Enterprise Plus.
How much does QMetry cost compared with Tuskr?
QMetry Test Management’s price is not publicly published (checked 17 September 2026); both Enterprise and Enterprise Plus show Contact Sales. Tuskr costs $90, $150 or $290 per user per year for Team, Business and Enterprise ($9, $15 or $29 billed monthly), with a 5-user minimum and a free plan for up to 5 users. Audit trail and 2FA start at Business; SSO needs Enterprise. Only QMetry’s separate Jira app has public prices, on the Atlassian Marketplace.
Is QMetry's Jira app the same thing as QMetry Test Management?
No. QMetry Test Management for Jira is a separate Atlassian Marketplace app for Jira Cloud and Data Center, priced by Jira user tier: $0 up to 10 users, $1,045 a year at 25 and $2,090 at 50 on Cloud. The standalone product runs outside Jira and syncs with it; our QMetry vs qTest comparison covers its editions further.
Can I move test cases between QMetry and Tuskr?
Yes, by CSV in either direction. QMetry exports test cases as XLSX or CSV and imports XLS, XLSX and CSV; Tuskr imports UTF-8 CSV at up to 1,000 test cases per batch and exports CSV. QMetry’s migration tool covers TestRail, HP ALM, Zephyr Squad, Xray and qTest, not Tuskr, and version history and approval records are outside Tuskr’s documented import.
